You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of world famine database for 1840–2019 and risk assessment of its occurrence and severity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/ad3c56 |
| Authors |
Soma Funahashi, Misato Okaneya, Taikan Oki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 10 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 35 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 98% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,321,968
of 25,990,612 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#1,626
of 6,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,188
of 287,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#19
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,990,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.