You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transorbital approach to the cavernous sinus: an anatomical study of the related cranial nerves
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnana.2024.1367533 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alejandra Mosteiro, Marta Codes, Roberto Tafuto, Roberto Manfrellotti, Jorge Torales, Joaquim Enseñat, Alberto Di Somma, Alberto Prats-Galino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 29% |
| Mexico | 1 | 14% |
| Brazil | 1 | 14% |
| Italy | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,437,326
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#371
of 1,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,380
of 165,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.