↓ Skip to main content

A gravitational eye: a method for extracting maximum information from gravitational potentials

Overview of attention for article published in Measurement Science & Technology, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A gravitational eye: a method for extracting maximum information from gravitational potentials
Published in
Measurement Science & Technology, April 2024
DOI 10.1088/1361-6501/ad404d
Authors

Geoffrey de Villiers, Jamie Vovrosh, Kevin Ridley, Michael Holynski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,345,776
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Measurement Science & Technology
#2,765
of 3,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,607
of 184,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Measurement Science & Technology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,272 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them