↓ Skip to main content

Relationship between first tarsometatarsal ligament morphology and its continuity with the fibularis longus and first tarsometatarsal joint degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Anatomy, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationship between first tarsometatarsal ligament morphology and its continuity with the fibularis longus and first tarsometatarsal joint degeneration
Published in
Clinical Anatomy, April 2024
DOI 10.1002/ca.24167
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kodai Sakamoto, Mutsuaki Edama, Haruki Osanami, Hirotake Yokota, Ryo Hirabayashi, Chie Sekine, Tomonobu Ishigaki, Hiroshi Akuzawa, Taku Toriumi, Ikuo Kageyama

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,971,871
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Anatomy
#1,115
of 1,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,969
of 175,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Anatomy
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.