↓ Skip to main content

Merging paleobiology with conservation biology to guide the future of terrestrial ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Science, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
twitter
265 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
244 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
689 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Merging paleobiology with conservation biology to guide the future of terrestrial ecosystems
Published in
Science, February 2017
DOI 10.1126/science.aah4787
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony D Barnosky, Elizabeth A Hadly, Patrick Gonzalez, Jason Head, P David Polly, A Michelle Lawing, Jussi T Eronen, David D Ackerly, Ken Alex, Eric Biber, Jessica Blois, Justin Brashares, Gerardo Ceballos, Edward Davis, Gregory P Dietl, Rodolfo Dirzo, Holly Doremus, Mikael Fortelius, Harry W Greene, Jessica Hellmann, Thomas Hickler, Stephen T Jackson, Melissa Kemp, Paul L Koch, Claire Kremen, Emily L Lindsey, Cindy Looy, Charles R Marshall, Chase Mendenhall, Andreas Mulch, Alexis M Mychajliw, Carsten Nowak, Uma Ramakrishnan, Jan Schnitzler, Kashish Das Shrestha, Katherine Solari, Lynn Stegner, M Allison Stegner, Nils Chr Stenseth, Marvalee H Wake, Zhibin Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 265 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 689 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Finland 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 673 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 131 19%
Researcher 120 17%
Student > Bachelor 74 11%
Student > Master 70 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 5%
Other 126 18%
Unknown 131 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 210 30%
Environmental Science 153 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 76 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 3%
Social Sciences 11 2%
Other 50 7%
Unknown 166 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 300. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#117,170
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Science
#3,758
of 83,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,770
of 430,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#60
of 1,132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.