↓ Skip to main content

Automation of MKID Simulations for Array Building with AEM (Automated Electromagnetic MKID Simulations)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Low Temperature Physics, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automation of MKID Simulations for Array Building with AEM (Automated Electromagnetic MKID Simulations)
Published in
Journal of Low Temperature Physics, April 2024
DOI 10.1007/s10909-024-03103-3
Authors

Cáthal McAleer, Oisin Creaner, Colm Bracken, Gerhard Ulbricht, Mario De Lucia, Jack Piercy, Tom Ray

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,076,220
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Low Temperature Physics
#309
of 760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,287
of 214,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Low Temperature Physics
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 760 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.