You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of permanent pacemaker implantation on long-term survival following cardiac surgery; A systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.04.024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yosuke Sakurai, J Hunter Mehaffey, Toshiki Kuno, Yujiro Yokoyama, Hisato Takagi, David A Denning, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Vinay Badhwar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,896,033
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#229
of 7,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,342
of 167,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,051 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.