You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wildfire impacts on the carbon budget of a managed Nordic boreal forest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110016 |
| Authors |
Julia Kelly, Natascha Kljun, Zhanzhang Cai, Stefan H. Doerr, Claudio D'Onofrio, Thomas Holst, Irene Lehner, Anders Lindroth, Shangharsha Thapa, Patrik Vestin, Cristina Santín |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,197,480
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Agricultural & Forest Meteorology
#182
of 2,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,107
of 154,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agricultural & Forest Meteorology
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.