You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Injectable bioactive poly(propylene fumarate) and polycaprolactone based click chemistry bone cement for spinal fusion in rabbits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jbm.a.37725 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xifeng Liu, Maria D. Astudillo Potes, Vitalii Serdiuk, Babak Dashtdar, Areonna C. Schreiber, Asghar Rezaei, A. Lee Miller, Abdelrahman M. Hamouda, Mahnoor Shafi, Benjamin D. Elder, Lichun Lu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,085,609
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A
#1,973
of 2,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,775
of 189,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,658 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.