↓ Skip to main content

PaCS-Toolkit: Optimized Software Utilities for Parallel Cascade Selection Molecular Dynamics (PaCS-MD) Simulations and Subsequent Analyses

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physical Chemistry B, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PaCS-Toolkit: Optimized Software Utilities for Parallel Cascade Selection Molecular Dynamics (PaCS-MD) Simulations and Subsequent Analyses
Published in
Journal of Physical Chemistry B, April 2024
DOI 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c01271
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinji Ikizawa, Tatsuki Hori, Tegar Nurwahyu Wijaya, Hiroshi Kono, Zhen Bai, Tatsuhiro Kimizono, Wenbo Lu, Duy Phuoc Tran, Akio Kitao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,227,530
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physical Chemistry B
#59
of 15,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,357
of 255,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physical Chemistry B
#2
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,059 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.