You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Computational scoring and experimental evaluation of enzymes generated by neural networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41587-024-02214-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sean R. Johnson, Xiaozhi Fu, Sandra Viknander, Clara Goldin, Sarah Monaco, Aleksej Zelezniak, Kevin K. Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 137 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 5% |
| Sweden | 4 | 3% |
| Japan | 4 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| China | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 72 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 76 | 55% |
| Scientists | 60 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#641,100
of 25,923,151 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#1,339
of 8,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,434
of 231,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#13
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,923,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.