You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A service evaluation of measuring fluid responsiveness in acutely unwell hypotensive patients outside of critical care
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103694 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adam Rossiter, James Anthony Hilton, S. Fizza Haider, Syed M.T. Nasser, Naomi Boyer, Cath Cooper, Charlene Davis, Debbie Marshall, Emma Skelding, Jennifer Pike, Laura Jarratt, Laura Wood, Lucy Knight, Sophie Holmes, Tamsin Cowman, Elaine Shepley, Natalie Dubravac, Wendy Gray, Caz Munday, Ben Creagh-Brown, Lui Forni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,561,554
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Intensive & Critical Care Nursing
#432
of 1,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,206
of 185,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive & Critical Care Nursing
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,124 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.