↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, outcome and biofilm forming properties in candidaemia: A single‐centre retrospective 4‐year analysis from Hungary

Overview of attention for article published in Mycoses, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, outcome and biofilm forming properties in candidaemia: A single‐centre retrospective 4‐year analysis from Hungary
Published in
Mycoses, April 2024
DOI 10.1111/myc.13727
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fruzsina Kovács, Noémi Balla, Aliz Bozó, Andrea Harmath, Ágnes Jakab, Zoltán Tóth, Fruzsina Nagy, László Majoros, Renátó Kovács

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,144,312
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Mycoses
#301
of 1,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,621
of 161,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycoses
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.