You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characterization of Colletotrichum species obtained from citrus in northern Thailand and introducing a new host record for C. plurivorum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Pathology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ppa.13908 |
| Authors |
Mousa Najafiniya, Antonio Roberto Gomes de Farias, Alireza Armand, Nootjarin Jungkhun, Ruvishika Jayawardena |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Morocco | 1 | 13% |
| Italy | 1 | 13% |
| India | 1 | 13% |
| Nepal | 1 | 13% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 13% |
| Burundi | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,564,538
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Plant Pathology
#439
of 2,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,047
of 157,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Pathology
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.