You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cancer diagnosis and treatment in working‐age adults: Implications for employment, health insurance coverage, and financial hardship in the United States
|
---|---|
Published in |
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians , April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3322/caac.21837 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
K. Robin Yabroff, Joanna F. Doran, Jingxuan Zhao, Fumiko Chino, Ya‐Chen Tina Shih, Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, Cathy J. Bradley, Monica F. Bryant |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 43% |
Australia | 2 | 9% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
Scientists | 6 | 26% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#409,090
of 25,893,933 outputs
Outputs from CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
#113
of 1,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,687
of 213,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,893,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 81.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.