You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The influence of false interoceptive feedback on emotional state and balance responses to height-induced postural threat
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biological Psychology, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108803 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mathew W Hill, Ellie Johnson, Toby J Ellmers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 13% |
India | 1 | 7% |
Brazil | 1 | 7% |
Uruguay | 1 | 7% |
Denmark | 1 | 7% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
Scientists | 5 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,561,554
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Biological Psychology
#493
of 1,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,256
of 180,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Psychology
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.