You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A future food boom rescues the negative effects of early-life adversity on adult lifespan in a small mammal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2023.2681 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren Petrullo, David Delaney, Stan Boutin, Jeffrey E. Lane, Andrew G. McAdam, Ben Dantzer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 47% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 207. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2024.
All research outputs
#193,849
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#454
of 11,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,358
of 178,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#5
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.