You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
XRF identification of sharp-force trauma in fresh and dry human bone under varied experimental heat conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science & Justice, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.scijus.2024.04.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joana Rosa, Luís A E Batista de Carvalho, Maria Paula M Marques, Maria Teresa Ferreira, David Gonçalves, Francisco P S C Gil |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 50% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 50% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#23,252,546
of 25,914,360 outputs
Outputs from Science & Justice
#696
of 856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,352
of 234,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science & Justice
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,914,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.