You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Case study analysis of innovative producers toward sustainable integrated crop-livestock systems: trajectory, achievements, and thought process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Agronomy for Sustainable Development, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13593-024-00953-9 |
| Authors |
Fernanda Gomes Moojen, Julie Ryschawy, J. D. Wulfhorst, David W. Archer, Paulo César de Faccio Carvalho, John R. Hendrickson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 43% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 43% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,730,309
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#539
of 881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,433
of 151,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.