You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification and management of preoperative anaemia in adults: A British Society for Haematology Guideline update
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Haematology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/bjh.19440 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katie Hands, Jahnavi Daru, Caroline Evans, Alwyn Kotze, Christopher Lewis, Shruthi Narayan, Toby Richards, Craig Taylor, Samantha Timmins, Alan Wilson, the BSH Committee |
| Abstract |
This updated British Society for Haematology guideline provides an up-to-date literature review and recommendations regarding the identification and management of preoperative anaemia. This includes guidance on thresholds for the diagnosis of anaemia and the diagnosis and management of iron deficiency in the preoperative context. Guidance on the appropriate use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and preoperative transfusion is also provided. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 14% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 44 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 64 | 70% |
| Scientists | 14 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 67% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 67% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2024.
All research outputs
#745,803
of 25,895,862 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Haematology
#84
of 8,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,820
of 211,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Haematology
#4
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,895,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.