You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Classification of optical water groups in the subarctic pacific and adjacent seas using satellite-derived light absorption spectra of chromophoric dissolved organic matter
|
---|---|
Published in |
Deep-Sea Research Part I, Oceanographic Research Papers, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.dsr.2024.104313 |
Authors |
Joji Oida, Toru Hirawake, Youhei Yamashita, Hiroto Abe, Jun Nishioka, Hisatomo Waga, Daiki Nomura, Shigeho Kakehi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,416,944
of 25,922,020 outputs
Outputs from Deep-Sea Research Part I, Oceanographic Research Papers
#1,263
of 2,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,411
of 95,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Deep-Sea Research Part I, Oceanographic Research Papers
#6
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,922,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.