You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The tale of HORTON: Lessons learned in a decade of scientific software development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Chemical Physics, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1063/5.0196638 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew Chan, Toon Verstraelen, Alireza Tehrani, Michelle Richer, Xiaotian Derrick Yang, Taewon David Kim, Esteban Vöhringer-Martinez, Farnaz Heidar-Zadeh, Paul W. Ayers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 18% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Chile | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 64% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,331,025
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Physics
#1,926
of 20,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,023
of 196,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Physics
#17
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,031 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.