↓ Skip to main content

Agree to disagree: reaching consensus amongst embryologists on the clinical management of low-quality blastocysts

Overview of attention for article published in Human Reproduction, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Agree to disagree: reaching consensus amongst embryologists on the clinical management of low-quality blastocysts
Published in
Human Reproduction, April 2024
DOI 10.1093/humrep/deae083
Pubmed ID
Authors

George Liperis, Sofia Makieva, Munevver Serdarogullari, Julia Uraji, Zoya Enakshi Ali, Valerio Pisaturo, Irene Cuevas-Saiz, Catello Scarica, Kashish Sharma, Juan J Fraire-Zamora

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,713,411
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Human Reproduction
#3,016
of 6,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,347
of 155,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Reproduction
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.