You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Diagnostic Pitfalls: Florid Mesothelial Hyperplasia and Mesothelioma of the Tunica Vaginalis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Human Pathology, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.humpath.2024.04.009 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sounak Gupta, J Kenneth Schoolmeester, John C Cheville |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 22% |
Colombia | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 15 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
Scientists | 2 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,790,595
of 25,844,815 outputs
Outputs from Human Pathology
#238
of 3,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,088
of 169,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Pathology
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,815 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.