You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of elevated nutrients on the Holocene evolution of the Great Barrier Reef
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quaternary Science Reviews, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.108636 |
| Authors |
Kelsey L. Sanborn, Jody M. Webster, Dirk Erler, Gregory E. Webb, Marcos Salas-Saavedra, Yusuke Yokoyama |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 50% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 25% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 50% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#655,778
of 25,818,700 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#187
of 3,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,969
of 144,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#7
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,818,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.