↓ Skip to main content

Topographic organization across foveal visual areas in macaques

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Topographic organization across foveal visual areas in macaques
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2024.1389067
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hangqi Li, Danling Hu, Hisashi Tanigawa, Toru Takahata

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#17,607,138
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#861
of 1,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,836
of 145,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.