You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A measles and rubella vaccine microneedle patch in The Gambia: a phase 1/2, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, active-controlled, age de-escalation trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00532-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ikechukwu Adigweme, Mohammed Yisa, Michael Ooko, Edem Akpalu, Andrew Bruce, Simon Donkor, Lamin B Jarju, Baba Danso, Anthony Mendy, David Jeffries, Anne Segonds-Pichon, Abdoulie Njie, Stephen Crooke, Elina El-Badry, Hilary Johnstone, Michael Royals, James L Goodson, Mark R Prausnitz, Devin V McAllister, Paul A Rota, Sebastien Henry, Ed Clarke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | 8 | 11% |
| United States | 8 | 11% |
| Australia | 6 | 9% |
| Gambia | 6 | 9% |
| Japan | 5 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Maldives | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 27 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 64% |
| Scientists | 14 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 36% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 629. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2024.
All research outputs
#36,665
of 26,122,087 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#758
of 43,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#478
of 303,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#8
of 328 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,122,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 328 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.