You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proof‐of‐concept study of anti‐Fel d 1 IgY antibodies in cat food using the MASK‐air® app
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/clt2.12353 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean Bousquet, Alina Gherasim, Frédéric de Blay, Eve Mathieu‐Dupas, Géraldine Batot, Daniel Laune, Bernardo Sousa‐Pinto, Torsten Zuberbier, Nhân Pham‐Thi, Bernard Hofmann, Emilie Urban‐Kraemer, Van‐Mai Nguyen‐Grosjean, Véronique Lustgarten, Catherine Defrance |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#14,898,569
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#490
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,165
of 170,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.