You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Collaborative Recognition of Wellbeing Needs: A Novel Approach to Universal Psychosocial Screening on the Neonatal Unit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10880-024-10016-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Davy Evans, Daisy Eatwell, Shevonne Hodson-Walker, Sarah Pearce, Vicky Reynolds, Shona Smith, Leah Whitehouse, Ruth Butterworth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 68% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 47% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 42% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,592,038
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#35
of 498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,802
of 169,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them