You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From lichens to crops: Pathogenic potential of Pseudomonas syringae from Peltigera lichens is similar to worldwide epidemic strains
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Pathology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ppa.13915 |
| Authors |
Natalia Ramírez, Emma Caullireau, Margrét Auður Sigurbjörnsdóttir, Elodie Vandelle, Oddur Vilhelmsson, Cindy E. Morris |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 5 | 33% |
| United States | 4 | 27% |
| Iceland | 2 | 13% |
| Austria | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,660,278
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from Plant Pathology
#189
of 2,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,352
of 191,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Pathology
#3
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,223 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.