↓ Skip to main content

Analysing the contribution of intermittent rivers to beta diversity can improve freshwater conservation in Mediterranean rivers

Overview of attention for article published in Aquatic Sciences, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysing the contribution of intermittent rivers to beta diversity can improve freshwater conservation in Mediterranean rivers
Published in
Aquatic Sciences, April 2024
DOI 10.1007/s00027-024-01074-x
Authors

Maria Soria, Núria Cid, Jean Ortega, Luis Mauricio Bini, Raúl Acosta, Cayetano Gutiérrez-Cánovas, Pablo Rodríguez-Lozano, Pau Fortuño, Dolors Vinyoles, Francesc Gallart, Narcís Prat, Núria Bonada

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,742,118
of 25,901,238 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Sciences
#102
of 710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,477
of 213,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Sciences
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,901,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 710 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them