↓ Skip to main content

Will Australia's tightened prescription system reduce nicotine vaping among young people?

Overview of attention for article published in Addiction, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Will Australia's tightened prescription system reduce nicotine vaping among young people?
Published in
Addiction, April 2024
DOI 10.1111/add.16508
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wayne D. Hall

Abstract

Australia introduced a prescription only policy for e-cigarettes in 2011 to prevent uptake among youth while allowing smokers to access e-cigarettes for cessation. This is one of the restrictive forms of regulation for e-cigarettes recommended by the World Health Organisation. To assess whether the policy has prevented e-cigarette youth uptake and facilitated smokers' access to e-cigarettes for cessation; and to examine a proposed toughening of the policy. An analysis of survey and administrative data on e-cigarette use and smoking and a critical analysis of the contents of submissions to parliamentary inquiries into the policy. E-cigarette use among youth and young adults has increased steeply since 2016 but very few of these products have been obtained through the prescription system, because medical authorities discourage their use. A policy change in 2021 to increase the prescription of e-cigarettes has not reduced e-cigarette use among youth and only marginally increased rates of prescribing. Australian policy makers have nonetheless tightened the prescription system by banning any use of e-cigarettes unless prescribed by a doctor and dispensed by a pharmacist. Australia's tightened prescription policy for e-cigarettes may reduce adolescent vaping but at the risk of reducing smokers' access to e-cigarettes and increasing the size of the illicit market for combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes. A more effective policy would allow vapes to be sold as consumer products by licensed tobacconists under regulations that require prior product approval, plain packaging, bans on their promotion and enforced age restrictions on purchases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,194,145
of 25,932,719 outputs
Outputs from Addiction
#1,531
of 6,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,596
of 215,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction
#16
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,932,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.