Interventions to encourage uptake of cancer screening for people with severe mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs: 1 blog
twitter: 10 X users

weibo: 1 weibo user

Readers on

mendeley: 22 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Interventions to encourage uptake of cancer screening for people with severe mental illness
Published in	Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI	10.1002/14651858.cd009641.pub2
Pubmed ID	23857563
Authors	Barley, Elizabeth, Borschmann, Rohan D, Walters, Paul, Tylee, Andre, Borschmann, Rohan
Abstract	Adults with severe mental illness (i.e. schizophrenia or other related psychotic disorders and bipolar disorder) can be at greater risk of cancer than those without severe mental illness (SMI). Early detection of cancer through screening is effective in improving patient outcomes including death. However, people with SMI are less likely than others to take up available cancer screening.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
United Kingdom	4	40%
Spain	1	10%
India	1	10%
Australia	1	10%
Unknown	3	30%

Demographic breakdown

Type
Type	Count	As %
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	4	40%
Members of the public	4	40%
Scientists	1	10%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)	1	10%

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Unknown	22	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Ph. D. Student	4	18%
Student > Master	4	18%
Researcher	4	18%
Student > Postgraduate	3	14%
Other	1	5%
Other	2	9%
Unknown	4	18%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	10	45%
Nursing and Health Professions	2	9%
Psychology	2	9%
Social Sciences	2	9%
Unknown	6	27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2016.

All research outputs

#3,395,877

of 32,750,863 outputs

Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#6,475

of 14,295 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#24,861

of 230,678 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#157

of 303 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 32,750,863 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 14,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.