You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A framework for understanding selection bias in real-world healthcare data
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), May 2024
|
DOI | 10.1093/jrsssa/qnae039 |
Authors |
Ritoban Kundu, Xu Shi, Jean Morrison, Jessica Barrett, Bhramar Mukherjee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 20% |
Japan | 1 | 10% |
Spain | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,739,223
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)
#301
of 943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,789
of 182,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.