↓ Skip to main content

Cellular host response sepsis test for risk stratification of patients in the emergency department: A pooled analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Academic Emergency Medicine, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cellular host response sepsis test for risk stratification of patients in the emergency department: A pooled analysis
Published in
Academic Emergency Medicine, April 2024
DOI 10.1111/acem.14923
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hollis R. O'Neal, Roya Sheybani, Chadd K. Kraus, Wesley H. Self, Ajay M. Shah, Christopher B. Thomas, Henry T. K. Tse, Robert Scoggins

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#886,402
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Academic Emergency Medicine
#216
of 3,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,116
of 190,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic Emergency Medicine
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.