You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CT-Based Radiomics Models for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules: A Multicenter Development-and-Validation.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Roentgenology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.2214/ajr.24.31077 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shaofan Lin, Ming Gao, Zehong Yang, Ruihuan Yu, Zhuozhi Dai, Chuling Jiang, Yubin Yao, Tingting Xu, Jiali Chen, Kainan Huang, Daiying Lin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| Sudan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,905,447
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Roentgenology
#954
of 7,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,235
of 181,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Roentgenology
#9
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.