↓ Skip to main content

Computational Models for Cytochrome P450: A Predictive Electronic Model for Aromatic Oxidation and Hydrogen Atom Abstraction

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Metabolism and Disposition, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Computational Models for Cytochrome P450: A Predictive Electronic Model for Aromatic Oxidation and Hydrogen Atom Abstraction
Published in
Drug Metabolism and Disposition, January 2002
DOI 10.1124/dmd.30.1.7
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Experimental observations suggest that electronic characteristics play a role in the rates of substrate oxidation for cytochrome P450 enzymes. For example, the tendency for oxidation of a certain functional group generally follows the relative stability of the radicals that are formed (e.g., N-dealkylation > O-dealkylation > 2 degrees carbon oxidation > 1 degree carbon oxidation). In addition, results show that useful correlations between the rates of product formation can be developed using electronic models. In this article, we attempt to determine whether a combined computational model for aromatic and aliphatic hydroxylation can be developed. Toward this goal, we used a combination of experimental data and semiempirical molecular orbital calculations to predicted activation energies for aromatic and aliphatic hydroxylation. The resulting model extends the predictive capacity of our previous aliphatic hydroxylation model to include the second most important group of oxidations, aromatic hydroxylation. The combined model can account for about 83% of the variance in the data for the 20 compounds in the training set and has an error of about 0.7 kcal/mol.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Japan 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 73 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Student > Master 12 15%
Other 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 26 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 9 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2012.
All research outputs
#9,516,022
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Drug Metabolism and Disposition
#763
of 2,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,257
of 142,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Metabolism and Disposition
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,779 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.