↓ Skip to main content

Effects of silanol defects and Ti site location within Ti-MWW on alkene epoxidation with aqueous hydrogen peroxide

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, October 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of silanol defects and Ti site location within Ti-MWW on alkene epoxidation with aqueous hydrogen peroxide
Published in
Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, October 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124119
Authors

Ohsung Kwon, David S. Potts, David W. Flaherty

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,139,675
of 25,899,121 outputs
Outputs from Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
#761
of 4,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#504
of 972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,899,121 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.