↓ Skip to main content

Phenotypic and functional characteristics of monocyte subsets in the blood and bone marrow of Indian subjects with Visceral Leishmaniasis

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Phenotypic and functional characteristics of monocyte subsets in the blood and bone marrow of Indian subjects with Visceral Leishmaniasis
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, April 2024
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Chemistry 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2024.
All research outputs
#28,624,913
of 34,388,610 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#9,881
of 11,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,420
of 376,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#114
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,388,610 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.