You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predicting the toxicity of sediment‐associated trace metals with simultaneously extracted trace metal: Acid‐volatile sulfide concentrations and dry weight‐normalized concentrations: A critical comparison
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/etc.5620170529 |
| Authors |
Edward R. Long, Donald D. MacDonald, James C. Cubbage, Chris G. Ingersoll |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2010.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#1,595
of 5,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,654
of 108,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#416
of 1,394 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,394 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.