You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Supporting best practice in the management of chronic diseases in primary health care settings: a scoping review of training programs for Indigenous Health Workers and Practitioners.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Australian Journal of Primary Health, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1071/py23124 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Odette Pearson, Shwikar Othman, Kate Colmer, Sana Ishaque, Gloria Mejia, Sarah Crossing, David Jesudason, Gary Wittert, Paul Zimmet, Sophia Zoungas, Natalie Wischer, Kim Morey, Jane Giles, Sara Jones, Alex Brown, Saravana Kumar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,636,662
of 25,850,376 outputs
Outputs from Australian Journal of Primary Health
#452
of 631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,436
of 156,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Journal of Primary Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,376 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them