You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Artificial intelligence in digital pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
npj Digital Medicine, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41746-024-01106-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clare McGenity, Emily L. Clarke, Charlotte Jennings, Gillian Matthews, Caroline Cartlidge, Henschel Freduah-Agyemang, Deborah D. Stocken, Darren Treanor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 19% |
| Canada | 4 | 15% |
| Philippines | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 81% |
| Scientists | 3 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 11% |
| Psychology | 1 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,372,230
of 25,884,216 outputs
Outputs from npj Digital Medicine
#564
of 1,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,752
of 171,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from npj Digital Medicine
#15
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,884,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.