↓ Skip to main content

Critical race theory and COVID‐19 vaccination: An experimental test of interest convergence

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Social Issues, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Critical race theory and COVID‐19 vaccination: An experimental test of interest convergence
Published in
Journal of Social Issues, May 2024
DOI 10.1111/josi.12611
Authors

Sophie Trawalter, James N. Druckman, Kyshia Henderson

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,754,266
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Social Issues
#533
of 1,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,317
of 160,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Social Issues
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.