You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Towards a toolkit for global insect biodiversity monitoring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rstb.2023.0101 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roel van Klink, Julie Koch Sheard, Toke T. Høye, Tomas Roslin, Leandro A. Do Nascimento, Silke Bauer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Japan | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#984,107
of 25,893,933 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#867
of 7,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,824
of 167,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,893,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.