↓ Skip to main content

Towards acoustic monitoring of bees: wingbeat sounds are related to species and individual traits

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
48 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards acoustic monitoring of bees: wingbeat sounds are related to species and individual traits
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, May 2024
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2023.0111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Rodríguez Ballesteros, Camille Desjonquères, Violeta Hevia, Marina García Llorente, Juan S. Ulloa, Diego Llusia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,393,166
of 25,947,988 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1,236
of 7,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,151
of 196,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#7
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,947,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.