Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, January 2024
Altmetric Badge
About this Attention Score
Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
Incorporating patient-specific hip orientation from weightbearing computed tomography affects discrete element analysis-computed regional joint contact mechanics in individuals treated with periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia
Published in
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, January 2024
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#19,114,314
of 27,712,151 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
#690
of 919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,907
of 408,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
#25
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,712,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 919 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
