You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Low exposition to lithium prevents nephrogenic diabetes insipidus but not microcystic dilations of the collecting ducts in long‐term rat model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archiv der Pharmazie, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ardp.202400063 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nahid Tabibzadeh, Mathieu Klein, Mélanie Try, Joël Poupon, Pascal Houillier, Christophe Klein, Lydie Cheval, Gilles Crambert, Samia Lasaad, Lucie Chevillard, Bruno Megarbane |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 6 | 43% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,409,983
of 25,889,720 outputs
Outputs from Archiv der Pharmazie
#166
of 1,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,213
of 170,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archiv der Pharmazie
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,889,720 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,729 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.