↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of High Tooth Replacement Rates in Sauropod Dinosaurs

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
47 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
66 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
30 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
4 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evolution of High Tooth Replacement Rates in Sauropod Dinosaurs
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069235
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Tooth replacement rate can be calculated in extinct animals by counting incremental lines of deposition in tooth dentin. Calculating this rate in several taxa allows for the study of the evolution of tooth replacement rate. Sauropod dinosaurs, the largest terrestrial animals that ever evolved, exhibited a diversity of tooth sizes and shapes, but little is known about their tooth replacement rates.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 115 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Master 14 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 48 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 26 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 466. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2026.
All research outputs
#74,349
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,192
of 225,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#342
of 222,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#21
of 5,268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.