You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The reflections of health service providers on implementing contingency management for methamphetamine use disorder in Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Drug & Alcohol Review, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/dar.13853 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Clay, Zachary Wilkinson, Meredith Ginley, Shalini Arunogiri, Michael Christmass, Dean Membrey, Paul MacCartney, Rachel Sutherland, Samantha Colledge‐Frisby, Alison D. Marshall, Jack Nagle, Louisa Degenhardt, Michael Farrell, Rebecca McKetin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 11 | 85% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,430,940
of 25,990,612 outputs
Outputs from Drug & Alcohol Review
#706
of 2,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,207
of 223,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug & Alcohol Review
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,990,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.