You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Synthesis of Novel Polymers with Biodegradability by Main-Chain Editing of Chiral Polyketones
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Chemical Society, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1021/jacs.4c04389 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haobo Yuan, Kohei Takahashi, Shinya Hayashi, Miwa Suzuki, Nobuhiro Fujikake, Ken-ichi Kasuya, Jian Zhou, Shintaro Nakagawa, Naoko Yoshie, Chifeng Li, Kazuya Yamaguchi, Kyoko Nozaki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 27% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| China | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
| Scientists | 6 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,683,769
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#2,795
of 67,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,297
of 157,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#28
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.